Sunday, October 3, 2010

A Debate Over Sola Fide: Opening Essay by Jeff

(See the Debate Index here)


A. Introduction:

Why engage in a debate on the subject of faith? As Hebrews 11:6 says, "Without faith it is impossible to please God." If God is to be pleased with the Christian, faith must have it's proper place. Of course, neither Catholic nor Protestant deny that faith is an essential aspect of the Christian life. But it is my firm conviction that only the Protestant doctrine of sola fide succeeds in giving faith its proper and due place in the Christian life; faith is its very foundation, the very substance of the gospel - through it we are justified, accepted by God; through it we obtain forgiveness from all sins past, present and future; through it we have hope in this life and in the life to come. Scripture affirms all of this. To deny that salvation comes through faith and faith alone is to rip out the very heart of Christianity - for Christ Himself preached that He was sent to give eternal life to those who believe in Him (John 3:16).

B. Summary of Sola Fide:
For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast. For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them. (Ephesians 2:8-10)
The above three verses provide an apt summary of the doctrine of sola fide, and I will use them to provide a general outline of the topics that I intend to support from Scripture during the course of this debate (as well as some general problems with any departure from this doctrine):
  1. By grace...: Eternal salvation is given as a free gift of God, irrespective of any merit or worth on our part. 
  2. ...you have been saved...: Although Christians await their final salvation on Judgment Day, the assurance of eternal life and the manifold blessings of salvation can be experienced here and now. Justification is a one-time event, leading the New Testament authors to continuously refer to salvation in the past tense (we have been saved).
  3. ...through faith...: Faith is the vehicle through which the grace of God comes to us. In itself faith has no inherent value; faith does not itself become our righteousness, but is merely the mechanism by which the righteousness of Christ is imputed to us. 
  4. ...this is not your own doing...: This is the bottom line of why any departure from sola fide is to be rejected - if salvation comes to the Christian by any other means than unmerited grace, received through faith, than salvation becomes not the work of God, but of the human will. This has two results: a) it dishonours God, and b) it turns the Christian life from a life of joyful exultation in the sheer mercy of God into a life of painful striving after salvation by works, a salvation which is never assured in this lifetime, and still less in the next.
  5. ...it is the gift of God, not a result of works...: Again, Paul re-iterates that salvation is a gift, received by faith. Salvation is not the result of works; works do not in any way effect a person's legal standing before God - those who are not justified by grace cannot please God, nor can those who are justified fail to finally be found worthy to enter the kingdom of God, for if it were otherwise, "grace would no longer be grace" (Rom. 11:6). 
  6. ...so that no one may boast...: Salvation, from beginning to end, is wholly the gracious work of God. If our works played a role in our justification, it leaves room for us to boast before God. It matters not whether we claim our works were made possible through the grace of God, as the Catholics do, or whether we deny outright the doctrine of original sin and suppose that we may choose to perform good works without any divine aid - to allow our works to effect for us a right standing before God is to give ourselves reason to boast before God. 
  7. ...For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them: One of the blanket accusations leveled against sola fide, which will no doubt come up in the course of this debate, is that it ignores or twists the innumerable passages which speak of the necessity of good works. However, what is at stake in this debate is not affirmation or denial that works are a necessary, indeed, an indispensable part of the Christian life. What is at stake is the role of works in the life of the Christian. The summary teaching of the New Testament is that works flow out of faith - in fact, good works must of necessity be from faith to be good works (Rom. 14:23). When the New Testament talks of good works, it is with this understanding, that works are contingent are being justified, never the other way around. 
Having summed up the doctrine of sola fide, I will here flesh out the two great topics of division in this debate: the role of faith, and the role of works.

C. The Role of Faith: 
Now we know that whatever the law says it speaks to those who are under the law, so that every mouth may be stopped, and the whole world may be held accountable to God. For by works of the law no human being will be justified in his sight, since through the law comes the knowledge of sin. But now the righteousness of God has been manifested apart from the law, although the Law and the Prophets bear witness to it - the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all who believe. For there is no distinction: for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, whom God put forward as a propitiation by his blood, to be received by faith. This was to show God's righteousness, because in his divine forbearance he had passed over former sins. It was to show his righteousness at the present time, so that he might be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus. (Romans 3:19-26, emphases mine) 
If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. For with the heart one believes and is justified, and with the mouth one confesses and is saved. For the Scripture says, "Everyone who believes in him will not be put to shame." For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek; for the same Lord is Lord of all, bestowing his riches on all who call on him. For "everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved." How then will they call on him they have not believed? And how are they to believe in him of whom they have never heard? And how are they to hear without someone preaching? And how are they to preach unless they are sent? As it is written, "How beautiful are the feet of those who preach the good news!" But they have not all obeyed the gospel. For Isaiah says, "Lord, who has believed what he has heard from us?" So faith comes from hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ. (Romans 10:9-17, emphases mine)
1. The Insufficiency of Works of the Law:

Works are incapable of justifying anyone in the sight of God. As Paul points out in Rom. 3:19-20, the purpose of the law is not to justify, but to condemn; it is not to remove guilt, but to affirm the guilt of all those who are under the law. "Those under those the law" refers to Jews; and yet, Paul states that the law speaks (to the Jews) in order that every mouth may be stopped, and the whole world may be guilty. 

Paul, in the preceding chapters of Romans, has already shown that the Gentiles are "without excuse" (Rom. 1:20), guilty before God. Now Paul shows that the Jews also, even those who were given a law of works, are equally guilty before God. Works of the law cannot save; the purpose of the law was not to justify the Jews, but to demonstrate their guilt before God. The law works among the Jewish people the same as the knowledge of God through creation works among the Gentiles in Romans 1:18-20 - to render them guilty before God. Thus, every mouth is stopped and the whole world is made guilty before God. 

Thus, obedience to the commands of God has never made anyone appear righteous before God. "None is righteous, no, not one". Jews and Greeks alike are under the curse of sin, both before the law was given, and after. 

2. The Sufficiency of Faith:

After Paul establishes the problem - that no one is righteous - he then turns to the solution God has given - salvation by faith alone. "Now the righteousness of God has been manifested...the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all who believe" (Rom. 3:21-22). Notice that Paul frames the problem as a lack of human righteousness; conversely, he frames the solution not as a new kind of human righteousness, a new kind of work that can be performed, but as the application of God's righteousness. 

Even more importantly, Paul explains that the righteousness of God is received through faith. The wording is important here. The Christian receives the righteousness of God - a passive action. The believer does not earn the righteousness of God, nor work for it, but receives it as a gift. Faith is the instrument through which this righteousness is received. Thus, faith is not righteousness in itself, but simply that through which righteousness is given. 

In Romans 10, Paul furthers this idea. He states simply in verse 9, "if you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved." If you believe, you will be saved - no qualification is given, there is not even a hint given that anything further is necessary. This is compounded by the parallel statement in verse 11: "Everyone who believes in him will not be put to shame." Faith, and faith alone, is sufficient to guarantee salvation. Lest anyone should mistakenly think that some external requirement is required by the phrase "calls upon the name of the Lord", Paul makes calling upon the name of the Lord contingent upon faith - just as our Lord Himself said, "out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks" (Matt. 12:34). 

So, Paul holds up not works, but faith alone as the sole requirement of salvation. 

3. Imputed Righteousness vs. Infused Righteousness:

Not only does the righteousness of God come to the believer through faith alone, but it is granted in a once-for-all legal declaration: 
Therefore, since we have been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ. Through him we have also obtained access by faith into this grace in which we stand, and we rejoice in the hope of the glory of God. (Romans 5:1-2)
The use of tense in these two verses make sense only if justification is considered a one-time event:
  • "we have been justified" - justification is used in the past tense. It was a moment in the past in the life of Paul and of the Roman Christians. He does not say that they were being justified, in the midst of a process of being justified. They had already been declared righteous. 
  • "we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ" - Because of the past event of justification, Paul and the Roman Christians had peace with God in the present. If the righteousness of God came incrementally, or through works, than their sins would not have been removed from them, and their indwelling sin would be counting against them. Thus, they would not have peace with God. But through faith, and by the imputation of Christ's righteousness, they have peace with God in the present time.
  • "Through him we have also obtained access by faith into this grace" - They obtained access in the past. Grace is the object which they gained access to, and faith was the means of that access.
  • "in which we stand" - They were, at the very moment Paul was writing, standing in the grace of God.
  • "and we rejoice" - they could rejoice, in the present, because their eternity was secured even then. Through faith, they had obtained an alien righteousness, the righteousness of God. 
D. The Rightful Place of Works.

If salvation is solely by faith, what is the place of works? Works are simply the outworking of true, saving faith. While salvation is effected by faith alone, saving faith infallibly results in works. As read in Ephesians 2:10, God has made us new creations in Christ in order that we would do good works. But our works are contingent upon faith. It is not that we must have good works in order to be saved; rather, we must be saved in order to have good works. "Without faith, it is impossible to please God" (Heb. 11:6), and "whatever does not proceed from faith is sin" (Rom. 14:23). 
Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation. The old has passed away; behold the new has come. All this is from God, who through Christ reconciled us to himself and gave us the ministry of reconciliation; that is, in Christ God was reconciling the world to himself, not counting their trespasses against them, and entrusting to us the message of reconciliation. Therefore, we are ambassadors for Christ, God making his appeal through us. We implore you on behalf of Christ, be reconciled to God. For our sake he made him to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God. (2 Corinthians 5:17-21)
Jesus himself said that we must be born again (John 3:3) and become new creatures in order to inherit the Kingdom of God. This is the result of justification by faith - the believer becomes a new creation. The outworking of faith is right action. Again, Christ speaks: "No good tree bears bad fruit, nor again does a bad tree bear good fruit, for each tree is known by its own fruit" (Luke 6:43-44). A person's work do not improve their standing with God; rather, a person's standing with God determines whether their works are good or evil. In the same way, Paul, after he has rebuked the Galatian church for departing from sola fide and beginning to trust in the work of circumcision for their justification, then lists the works (fruit) of the flesh (Gal. 5:19-21) and warns that those who do such things will not inherit the kingdom of God. Why not - because they must earn their righteous standing before God? No, for that would flatly contradict what Paul had spent almost 4 chapters laying out. Evil works prove an evil, unjustified heart. Likewise, Paul then lists the fruit of the Spirit. The fruit we produce is either good or evil - we have been justified in order that we would produce good fruit (Eph. 2:10). Paul concludes his list of the fruit of the Spirit with the encouragement that "those who belong to Christ Jesus have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires. If we live by the Spirit, let us also walk by the Spirit" (Gal. 5:24-25). For those who believe, the flesh, the "bad tree" from which came all our evil works, has been crucified (past tense) through faith. Since by the Spirit we have been born again (John 3:6) and now live, we walk by the Spirit. Our works are either good or evil, according to what kind of tree we are. Those who have been justified will also become sanctified.

E. Conclusion:


The plenary teaching of the New Testament is that we are saved, not by works, but by faith alone. While some passages may make this more explicit than others, when taken together, the right conclusion is clear: sola fide is the only consistent and biblical way to view salvation.

Sunday, September 26, 2010

A Debate Over Sola Fide: Introduction

A Catholic name Nick has requested that I debate him via blog over the topic of Sola Fide - the doctrine of salvation by faith alone. The debate will begin this week, with contributions due at the end of each week.

The Topic:


Resolution: The Bible teaches Justification by Faith Alone.
Affirmed: Jeff
Denied: Nick


The Format:

Essays are 3,000 words maximum, posted publicly on our blogs by the end of each week (by midnight on Saturday). A 1 week grace period is given to each debater in the event their personal life wont let them get around to posting. Comment boxes are closed, except for the Concluding Essay.

Week1: Both sides present an Opening Essay. 
Week2*: Both sides present a Rebuttal Essay. 
Week2*: Both sides submit 5 Questions to the other person. 
Week3: Both sides submit Answers to the questions. 
Week4: Both sides submit a Concluding Essay. 

Comments will be closed for all sections of the debate, save for the concluding essays.

I will add the links to each portion of the debate as they are posted:
Opening Essays:        Affirmed / Denied
Rebuttal Essays:        Affirmed / Denied
Questions:                 Affirmed / Denied
Answers:                   Affirmed / Denied
Concluding Essays:    Affirmed / Denied

Thursday, September 16, 2010

The Wittenberg Door: Church Recognition

The Wittenberg Door: Church Recognition

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

Ezra Levant on the Ethics of the Oilsands

If we actually want to make the world a better place, a more moral place, the ethical thing to do is to pump as much oil as we possibly can out of the oil sands, knowing that every barrel we produce in Canada displaces a fascist barrel from Saudi Arabia, a misogynist barrel from Iran and a dictatorial barrel from Venezuela. 
(http://ezralevant.com/2010/09/first-press-coverage-of-ethica.html)
Ezra Levant is my new BFF - a conservative champion in a sea of liberal propaganda.

Self-Help Books as Self-Fulfilling Prophecy

I came across a book in the King's Bookstore entitled "Three Steps to Getting the Relationship YOU Want."

That would be the problem, wouldn't it? If your relationship sucks, it's probably because

  • you are self-centered, and
  • you think there's a quick, 3-step fix

Both are lies. So if you are the type of person who would buy such a book, you probably will not ever have a successful relationship, because it isn't quick or easy, and most of all it's about self-giving and not self-fulfillment: learning to esteem another person's needs as more important than your own. 

Needless to say, the book in question now lies buried underneath a stack of other books, so that you won't find it unless you are looking very hard for it. 

I Wonder if THIS Will be Mentioned...

And they heard the sound of the Lord God walking in the garden in the cool of the day, and the man and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the Lord God among the trees of the garden. But the Lord God called to the man and said to him, “Where are you?” And he said, “I heard the sound of you in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked, and I hid myself.” (Gen. 3:8-10, emphasis mine)
What is the root of fear? Sin.

Adam and Eve eat the forbidden fruit, sin enters the world, and as a result, they experience fear.

I'll be waiting for someone at the conference to mention that fear is the result of sin, and that the remedy for sin is repentance and faith in Jesus Christ.

Interdisciplinary Studies Conference Tomorrow...

Tomorrow is the semi-annual Interdisciplinary Studies (I.S.) Conference at King's.

The conference markets itself as "an exploration of a particular topic from multiple perspectives." In my experience, however, it generally takes the form of examining a left-wing issue from a left-wing perspective. Somehow, no matter what the topic of the conference, the themes of climate change, poverty, homelessness and war always come to dominate the discussion. In the words of a former fellow student, one particular conference resembled "a left-wing political rally from the '60's". Well said.

The particular conference this student referred to was the first one I attended, in the Fall of 2008. It was called Invisible Dignity; the premise being that discrimination, poverty, etc. cause a person's inherent human dignity to become invisible to others. One speaker at this conference, Dennis Edney, introduced the University-College to the issues surrounding Omar Khadr. The university almost immediately leapt on the Khadr bandwagon, campaigning for his repatriation to Canada. Now, Mr. Edney is one of Khadr's lawyer - a fact which often seems to be forgotten in all this fuss. Was the picture of Khadr painted for me and my fellow students the whole picture? Hard to say, because no one bothered to check up on the facts. Instead, they accepted this lawyer's statements as the whole truth.

Next came the Truth and Reconciliation conference, concerning the Indian Residential School system in Canada. Now, in this case the topic of the conference was verifiable historical fact - there were residential schools, and the students did endure the abuse of being forcibly taken from their families in order to become Anglicized. I learned a lot of vital history concerning Aboriginal relations. But, the conference seemed to be trying to hard to pander to Aboriginal people - and the Aboriginal story never stayed the same. On the one hand, some said that financial compensation from the government was necessary so the government could demonstrate that it took the victims seriously; on the other hand, others said that the government was trying to buy it's way out of responsibility by simply "throwing money" at the victims in the hope they'd go away. On the one hand, some thought the Prime Minister should offer an official apology for the schools; when such an apology came forth, some condemned it as mere words. There was, of course, no hint that Aboriginals could also be responsible for the strained relations with the government today - it was all the white man's fault.

The next conference was on technology. That's all that I know. I was on the worship team that played during the conference, and thus I did not have to complete the assignment (and therefore I didn't have to attend the conference the parts I was playing for). That was by far my favourite conference thus far.

Finally, the most recent conference this past January concerned homelessness. A worthy topic, to be sure. But the definition of "homeless" was greatly stretched to accommodate refugees from war, climate change, and various other points on the liberal agenda. Of course, homeless people were, one and all, helpless victims of "the system"; and of course, the government was responsible to step in to rectify the situation.

BUT I think that the conference which starts tomorrow might actually be worthwhile. Not because there will be a lack of leftist propaganda. It will be good simply because the topic which cannot possibly be completely messed up, however bell-bottomed the politics may be.

The subject is fear. As I perused the schedule of lectures, I noticed that, true to form, there is a very leftist spin being put on fear: xenophobia, homophobia, Islamophobia... but it looks as if there will be enough food for thought to stimulate even the interest of a hard-nosed Conservative such as myself.

Even better - I've learned two things about the 3-page paper that is required to get the credit for the conference (it's a course, and you need six terms worth of it for any degree program at King's. I find that absolutely ridiculous, but I also digress):

  1. You need only prove you attended enough of the conference to grasp one key concept and blither semi-intelligently about it for 3 pages, and
  2. You can vehemently disagree with that same key concept (thereby calling the whole conference into question) and still pass the assignment. 
So, I don't need to be at the whole conference. Almost half of the student body sleeps in on the second day of the conference anyway. I suspect that I could write my paper right now without attending the conference, by disagreeing with a position that I can reasonably assume the keynote speaker is going to take on an issue. For example, it will probably be a pro-gay conference; I could write about a biblical stance on homosexuality for 3 pages and take the next two days off. But, since that's slightly dishonest, I'm instead going to sleep in both days and attend the conference in the afternoons - this will yield ample material to write the assignment with. 

In fact, since Mr. Dennis Edney is back to rally the troops for Omar Khadr, who is currently on trial for his alleged war crimes, a friend and I have jokingly agreed to write anti-Khadr sentiments whatever form the conference takes. So, in a sense, my paper is already written. Maybe I could charge a fee to write I.S. papers for other people - carve out a little business niche for myself, as it were.

Oh wait - that's dishonest too...

Saturday, September 4, 2010

No One is Saved by Praying a Prayer

The Lawman Chronicles: 'Jesus Los Angeles' Billboard